A new chapter in social responsibility
Addressing these challenges is complex. Not only does it require political will, but also coordinated actions across government, industry and civil society to ensure systems that protect workers and effective enforcement. This raises a fundamental question: how does each actor translate their responsibility into action, and what role should the MSC play?
Our Purpose
For years, NGOs and businesses have called on the MSC to extend its assurance work beyond environmental sustainability to include social criteria. With over 20% of the world’s wild marine catch engaged in the MSC program, it is understandable why stakeholders see an opportunity for broader impact. However, the MSC’s founding mission—to end overfishing—remains unfinished.
Established over 25 years ago, the MSC was created to address the urgent environmental crisis of depleted fish stocks and ecosystem damage caused by overfishing. We do this by harnessing the power of the market through certification and ecolabelling, incentivising fisheries to improve by responding to retail and public demand for certified sustainable seafood.
While there has been growing demand for sustainably sourced foods and improved regulatory frameworks in different parts of the world over the past 25 years, the challenge is clear: over a third of fish stocks remain overfished. Recognising this, the MSC has chosen to stay true to its original mandate.
In line with our mission, our assessment tools, infrastructure and expertise are robust and well established for evaluating ecological health and determining environmental sustainability. However, they are not designed to address labour related issues with the same level of effectiveness.
The MSC’s program requirements
However, as with any policy, it is essential to continually review whether these are working as intended.
Taking stock
In 2023, journalistic investigations raised doubts about the ability of social audits to reliably identify forced and child labour in supply chains. At the same time, approaches to monitoring and addressing these issues were evolving, with businesses increasingly adopting more robust due diligence processes.
In light of these developments, we convened an expert panel comprising individuals from NGOs, business, and with legal experience in human rights, to review our approach. After careful consideration of the panel’s recommendations, we have decided to remove third-party labour audits from our pre-entry requirements. While these audits were intended to exclude entities or mandate remedial action if forced or child labour was identified, there are legitimate concerns about their effectiveness for detecting forced or child labour.
The panel also considered the MSC’s role in supporting broader industry efforts to address forced and child labour. Their recommendation was clear: support businesses in meeting their due diligence obligations. Due diligence as set in the UN Guiding Principles and OECD guidelines, requires businesses to continuously monitor their supply chains, identify, assess, prevent, and mitigate adverse human rights impacts. It is an approach that goes beyond audits and recognises that addressing human rights abuses requires collaborative engagement, transparent disclosure and continuous action.