Shark finning: identifying further solutions

Improving our standard

Our recent updating of the MSC Fisheries Certification Process v2.2 clarified the MSC Board's intent that shark finning is not to be undertaken within MSC certified fisheries. But there are still concerns that the current requirements do not reflect global best practice or lead to consistent outcomes. 

This review will consider whether our current shark finning requirements deliver the needed confidence that shark finning is not occurring in an MSC certified fishery. We want to make sure we have the right incentives for fisheries seeking certification to actively improve their efforts to prevent shark finning.  

Progress so far

We are conducting a thorough review of the current global management practices on shark finning. We want to find out if there has been progress in the science and management of shark finning that could be used to update our Standard. 

Review of best practice in the prevention of shark finning

We commissioned an independent consultant to carry out a thorough review of current global management practices for shark finning. A key focus of this review was on a fins naturally attached policy (FNA), a policy which requires the whole shark to be landed without processing at sea.  The review identified a general increase in the uptake of FNA since the publication of the current MSC Fisheries Standard in 2014. It was also found that under certain management regimes, FNA policies are applied with the possibility for exemptions under specific conditions.

The independent consultant investigated the uptake and implementation mechanisms for shark finning bans across 43 nations with the highest levels of shark fishing. Within this, the review explored the prevalence and uptake of FNA policies. 

Of the 43 shark fishing nations reviewed:
• 21 have a finning ban in place
• 19 have an FNA policy in place
• Four only apply conservation and management measures set by regional fisheries management organisations
• Nine have no finning bans
• Nine are unknown or unverifiable

FNA, Fin to Carcass Ratios and Fins Artificially Attached were the main methods used to ensure compliance with a finning ban across the respective jurisdictions sampled.

How could the standard change?

The result of the review could lead to a change in requirements and guidance of the MSC Fisheries Standard.

This means we could see a change in the way the requirements are articulated, to ensure the intent is clear. Most notably, we may need to make changes to the evidence required for Conformity Assessment Bodies to ensure compliance with our shark finning requirements.  

We will not change the intent of the Fisheries Standard, which is to ensure shark finning does not occur within MSC certified fisheries. Any changes will be in line with current global best practice both for management and identification or monitoring of shark finning, and will be informed through consultancy with stakeholders. 

Get involved

Stakeholders are at the heart of our Fisheries Standard Review, helping identify issues, develop solutions and test the possible impacts of any proposed changes. We are holding a series of stakeholder consultation events in 2020 and 2021 including virtual workshops and online surveys. 

We held two virtual consultation workshops in July 2020 to engage with stakeholders and seek input into the review of our requirements for shark finning. 

To be notified of future activities please sign up for our Fisheries Standard Review update